Observed source material
The direct 21 September capture of the Affplus listing places the exact Sensor +Neo Codrix name in a smart-link affiliate context. This is evidence about the listing publisher's presentation. It does not expose the routing implementation or authenticate a financial operator. No request was followed through to an account, and the relationship to Sensor Codrix Neo remains unestablished.
A smart-link label is not a documented routing rule
A technical explanation of the actual offer would identify which address is reached and which terms apply there. Ask whether the destination can vary and how the service provider is identified in each case. A campaign-level statement should not be treated as a product specification for all possible destinations. These are questions to delimit a future investigation, not claims about how this listing's system actually selects or processes visitors.
Requirements for further verification
The next evidence is a traceable offer at a particular endpoint, with an attributable description of its provider and service. That would allow an assessment to refer to a defined system instead of a marketing label. We have not tested routing, submitted contact data or measured account behaviour. The unknown status preserves those limits and does not infer a common operator from a similar name or the presence of a plus sign.